Chapter 5 of Mike Palmquist’s book, The Bedford Researcher, describes how to evaluate sources. Palmquist
says that “At the beginning of your research project, you’ll most likely make
quick judgments about your sources.” (Page 82) He then goes into detail on how
to evaluate the relevance of your source and how this method will help you to
better judge future sources you find. He starts by saying that by questioning
your purpose and audience; evaluating the evidence of a source by asking if
there is enough and right kind of evidence; evaluating the author of your
source based on knowledge and affiliation; evaluating the publisher of your
source; evaluating the timeliness of your source; evaluating your source’s
comprehensiveness; and finally evaluating your source’s genre. After describing
this in detail, Palmquist adds that not all types of sources are evaluated the
same way. There are web sites, blogs, newsgroups, email lists, discussion forms,
social networking sites, and wikis; which all need to be evaluated based on
relevance and credibility. You also need to evaluate the relevance and accuracy
of field sources, things like interviews, observations, and surveys. Palmquist’s
main point he is getting across with all of this is that finding the right
sources by evaluation will get you the farthest in research writing.
No comments:
Post a Comment